Photo credit; clchild |
Few days back, I was on a public
bus. A woman was sitting next to me with her toddler. It seemed that her baby
had just started to utter some words in an impenetrable way. First I thought
she was trying to say 'mummy' and didn't care much. Later, I realized, it was
something different. She was trying to say 'madise'. I thought I was mistaken
but may be I had a strange look listening that, the mother with a smile said, achel ghar ma dherai yehi bisayema kura
huncha, ani nani le pani yehi bhaneko bhanai garche. (Now a days, there are
so many discussions about Madhesh, so she picked that word from that) And that
gave me a bang on my head and it started juggling with the term 'madhise' she
was saying. She should have picked the word 'Madheshi'. That hinted she had
only heard the derogatory term used for Madhesh in her surroundings.
With this, I thought of knowing
what my children are thinking on the prevailing context and asked my students
(aged not more than 12) in one of my classes. As talking about the political
issues with small children is a bit difficult, I was trying to wave the words
in an understandable way. But before I could say anything one of the boys said,
"miss madise haru le ta hamro desh khayo ni hau?" (The people of
Madhesh engulfed our country). Then I asked him to justify his answer on which
he said, "I am telling what I have heard miss." Then I said him
demanding rights don't necessarily mean engulfing the country. As a citizen we
all have equality and have right to voice for our needs."
Then another asked, "In the
name of their right, don't they have to think of pahade's right?"
Umm…thank you for your question but your question has a mistake, it's not about
pahade's right or madheshi's right only,
no one has the right to harm other's right for the sake of owns. What is
important is whether we demand our right or use our right we must think about
others rights as well." I said to him. Then the question and answer
shifted towards rights and ways on getting our right and so many other issues
like the blockade, shortage of goods and so on. I tried to satisfy them with
balanced answer neither talking in favor of Madhesh nor Pahad but about the
importance of right to everyone. That conversation made me realize that, those
children were not speaking their point of view but were taking out just those
things that they have heard these days.
I teach the students of hilly
area, so the point of views were against the people of terai region and what I
am sure is if we talk with the children of terai region, we will definitely
find the point of view against the people of hilly region in the present context.
Most research on human
development agrees that the historical era in which late childhood and early
adolescence are spent is also one of the most important determinants of a
child's development. Social constructivism is a paradigm in developmental
psychology that characterizes learning as a process of actively constructing
knowledge through an interaction between the knowledge they bring to a
situation and social or cultural exchanges within that content.
I remember most of the friends of
my batch even now intentionally or unintentionally calling 'dhoti' whenever
they see someone from the terai origin. We picked up the term as we were grown
up on the same culture and surrounding when we were child. The context changed
and we grew up but our tongue still slips and we use the term. This may seem so
small in the context of what problem the nation is going around today in the
name of pahad and madhesh but this certainly has a role in igniting the fire of
anger and hatred among us and resulted what we are facing today. The turmoil of
madhesh is not new, though it is probably the longest one in the country's
history. What I feel is if we had got the right information about these issues
during our childhood, the situation wouldn't have turned worse. Now, we are
repeating the same mistake.
Here, my point is not that we
should change our perspective. But what is important is we must respect each
other's perspective and also respect each other's identity. Most of all we must
be careful when we are talking in front of or around our children on how we are
speaking and what kinds of words and language we are using. One for their
development and the other is that it is their right as a human to get the right
information. Later, it's on their hand how they interpret it but our
responsibility is to foster a good learning environment for them.
We are tired of all these blood
sheds, aren't we? So let's not do the mistake that our guardians did. We have
already sacrificed a lot and to make it good, we are ready to sacrifice more
for the future of our children. Let us create a generation where they can
respect each other's existence. If we don't think about it now, definitely our children
are going to see more blood sheds when they grow, which may not be only on the
case of madhesh and pahad issue, but also on dalit, janajati and the issues of
other minorities groups.
Preacher Billy Graham, rightly
says, "The greatest legacy one can pass on to one's children and
grandchildren is not money or other material things accumulated in one's life,
but rather a legacy of character and faith.
True and real... I am a Nepali Madhesi from Janakpur zone and I saw these feeling from my childhood. At the beginning of my childhood, I used to see discrimination among pahadis and madhesi as if madhesi borned as a slave and pahadis as a landlord (malik/jamindar). And on 2064/65 BS, there emerged a revolution for good but the bad people/politician took it for profit and spread feeling to all pahadia chor madhesh chod and madise/dhoti chor pahad xod. People forgot that madhesi is the people of terai and pahadis of hilly region. I am just confused to blame to whom to myself, my society, color of my skin, my ancestors, madhesi, pahadis. To whom?
ReplyDelete